To your point TriTorch, its probably instructive that Warren Buffet has a huge percentage of his money invested in bonds, not shares and is reported to be selling down shares. Buffet is famously said to have said that he invests in people not businesses. That is he looks at the people running a business and assesses the viability and future of the business on the capacity of the managers. Is Buffet sending messages about the current crop of managers in most businesses?
Ken, I'm sure you know all about what follows, but for the sake of your readers: Here's how they are utilizing financing to put a stranglehold on these companies to push these unpopular policies (everything goes back to the currency spigot in the land of the root of all evil). These American brands are being destroyed on purpose to demoralize the populace making us ripe for collapse and then takeover:
Today most big companies rely on their sales to pay off their financing. Without this financing nearly every major corporation in America would fold almost overnight.
Think back to 2008, the main concern was the credit crunch: banks stopped loaning money in order to survive the crash, but this would have taken the entire system down with it because most major corporations rely on short term financing to make payroll, buy materials, and pay rent. They then pay off these loans and immediately apply for new ones. This occurs on a monthly, weekly, and even overnight basis.
It is an absolutely backwards system, but that's what having a currency unthethered from any real anchor (gold for example) gets you over time: When a Business starts by borrowing money, they will likely never stop.
Rather than using profits to end this cycle and escape this credit quicksand, profits instead are often pushed into dividends, stock buybacks, and bond interest/repayments (further enriching the company execs along with the top 1%). What remains is typically used as collateral for both capital expenditures and future OPEX loans, meanwhile the day to day operating expenses are mostly paid via the churning credit spiral described above.
Take away that punch bowl and all hell breaks loose.
For the NWO that's a feature not a bug. Fragility was deliberately woven into every aspect of our economy so that it can be demolished (and rebuilt to their sinister specifications) at will. What follows is how the WEF is rewriting everything with DEI by controlling the financing of all of these companies, along with an example of the consequences, followed by a brief overhead view of our dire situation.
---
Unknown Speaker: There's three initiatives that are put down through the WEF.
CEI (Corporate Equality Index)
ESG (Environmental, Social, & Governance)
DEI (Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion)
These initiatives are put down as social initiatives from the World Economic Forum, the most powerful people on the planet, through the banks to the big corporations.
These corporations, unlike my business, actually depend on that financing 100%. So if they don't do the things that these three initiatives, the CEI, ESG, and the DEI say, they actually lose their funding, so they can't operate their business.
So you say, why aren't these people smart enough to understand they're destroying their business? They can't not do it. Because if they don't do it they won't get their funding, so they can't operate so they have no choice but to do it.
And they drive their business into the dirt, and here's why that's happening. Because the people who run these companies - the officers of the companies are not the founders of the companies. These are people that are many generations removed and many degrees of caring about the actual brand, removed. All right?
So these people are college graduates who think they know a bunch of stuff because they have an advanced degree, and they are making decisions that are, you know, basically about the money. And they think that eventually people will adopt this and it will stop, but it's not going to stop and it's not supposed to stop.
What's happening is we are dealing with a communist insurgency that is undermining the values and the identity of the American public. What they are doing is they are intentionally creating a scenario where the American people are rejecting this initiative, [and this] is actually hurting iconic American brands that remove much of the American identity. So, when you name these companies off: all of these companies represent America - when you think of them traditionally.
So now, they're removing part of the identity, which is part of the communist process called demoralization. There's less identity in America, there's less to fight for, which makes it easier to conquer. Alright.
Then on top of it, one of the goals, of communism, is to create two classes of very poor and very rich. So what they're doing here is they are getting the American public to cancel all their own companies. That actually hurts their own neighbors who are good, hardworking American people. The people at Bud Light - at the top - are not the ones feeling the pain here. It's the delivery drivers, it's the hard working red, white, and blue Americans that believe the same [things] that you all believe, who are getting fired or laid off, or losing because of this.
So they have run an operation to push this initiative down the companies' throats intentionally, where the companies cannot resist it because they're required to do so for their funding, knowing that the American people are going to reject it and destroy these companies, creating the lower class system that they're trying to create in the first place.
I was vaguely aware of this corporate financial structure but not in the details you've given. it's a ludicrous, 'fatten-those-at-the-top' kind of structure, and we're all caught up in it via superannuation, pension and 401 schemes that punish us financially if we don't participate.
It's great to see respect being paid to Adler's teaching. I seldom see such. To my mind, Adler seems to use common sense. I guess that if you are interested in Adler, you might also be interested in Viktor Frankl.
Pretty tight I’d say. Pessimism in that the woke individuals see themselves as powerless and manipulated by … what ever takes their imagination and is useable to further a political agenda
To your point TriTorch, its probably instructive that Warren Buffet has a huge percentage of his money invested in bonds, not shares and is reported to be selling down shares. Buffet is famously said to have said that he invests in people not businesses. That is he looks at the people running a business and assesses the viability and future of the business on the capacity of the managers. Is Buffet sending messages about the current crop of managers in most businesses?
Ken, I'm sure you know all about what follows, but for the sake of your readers: Here's how they are utilizing financing to put a stranglehold on these companies to push these unpopular policies (everything goes back to the currency spigot in the land of the root of all evil). These American brands are being destroyed on purpose to demoralize the populace making us ripe for collapse and then takeover:
Today most big companies rely on their sales to pay off their financing. Without this financing nearly every major corporation in America would fold almost overnight.
Think back to 2008, the main concern was the credit crunch: banks stopped loaning money in order to survive the crash, but this would have taken the entire system down with it because most major corporations rely on short term financing to make payroll, buy materials, and pay rent. They then pay off these loans and immediately apply for new ones. This occurs on a monthly, weekly, and even overnight basis.
It is an absolutely backwards system, but that's what having a currency unthethered from any real anchor (gold for example) gets you over time: When a Business starts by borrowing money, they will likely never stop.
Rather than using profits to end this cycle and escape this credit quicksand, profits instead are often pushed into dividends, stock buybacks, and bond interest/repayments (further enriching the company execs along with the top 1%). What remains is typically used as collateral for both capital expenditures and future OPEX loans, meanwhile the day to day operating expenses are mostly paid via the churning credit spiral described above.
Take away that punch bowl and all hell breaks loose.
For the NWO that's a feature not a bug. Fragility was deliberately woven into every aspect of our economy so that it can be demolished (and rebuilt to their sinister specifications) at will. What follows is how the WEF is rewriting everything with DEI by controlling the financing of all of these companies, along with an example of the consequences, followed by a brief overhead view of our dire situation.
---
Unknown Speaker: There's three initiatives that are put down through the WEF.
CEI (Corporate Equality Index)
ESG (Environmental, Social, & Governance)
DEI (Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion)
These initiatives are put down as social initiatives from the World Economic Forum, the most powerful people on the planet, through the banks to the big corporations.
These corporations, unlike my business, actually depend on that financing 100%. So if they don't do the things that these three initiatives, the CEI, ESG, and the DEI say, they actually lose their funding, so they can't operate their business.
So you say, why aren't these people smart enough to understand they're destroying their business? They can't not do it. Because if they don't do it they won't get their funding, so they can't operate so they have no choice but to do it.
And they drive their business into the dirt, and here's why that's happening. Because the people who run these companies - the officers of the companies are not the founders of the companies. These are people that are many generations removed and many degrees of caring about the actual brand, removed. All right?
So these people are college graduates who think they know a bunch of stuff because they have an advanced degree, and they are making decisions that are, you know, basically about the money. And they think that eventually people will adopt this and it will stop, but it's not going to stop and it's not supposed to stop.
What's happening is we are dealing with a communist insurgency that is undermining the values and the identity of the American public. What they are doing is they are intentionally creating a scenario where the American people are rejecting this initiative, [and this] is actually hurting iconic American brands that remove much of the American identity. So, when you name these companies off: all of these companies represent America - when you think of them traditionally.
So now, they're removing part of the identity, which is part of the communist process called demoralization. There's less identity in America, there's less to fight for, which makes it easier to conquer. Alright.
Then on top of it, one of the goals, of communism, is to create two classes of very poor and very rich. So what they're doing here is they are getting the American public to cancel all their own companies. That actually hurts their own neighbors who are good, hardworking American people. The people at Bud Light - at the top - are not the ones feeling the pain here. It's the delivery drivers, it's the hard working red, white, and blue Americans that believe the same [things] that you all believe, who are getting fired or laid off, or losing because of this.
So they have run an operation to push this initiative down the companies' throats intentionally, where the companies cannot resist it because they're required to do so for their funding, knowing that the American people are going to reject it and destroy these companies, creating the lower class system that they're trying to create in the first place.
Much more info here, this along with illegal immigration must be stopped at all costs: https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/why-all-these-brands-ab-inbev-target
Thanks for this TriTorch,
I was vaguely aware of this corporate financial structure but not in the details you've given. it's a ludicrous, 'fatten-those-at-the-top' kind of structure, and we're all caught up in it via superannuation, pension and 401 schemes that punish us financially if we don't participate.
It's great to see respect being paid to Adler's teaching. I seldom see such. To my mind, Adler seems to use common sense. I guess that if you are interested in Adler, you might also be interested in Viktor Frankl.
What do you see as the connection between "woke" and "pessimism"?
Pretty tight I’d say. Pessimism in that the woke individuals see themselves as powerless and manipulated by … what ever takes their imagination and is useable to further a political agenda
Woke = pessimism = mistrust = fear = powerlessness = depression etc etc.
Intentional.
I think you're right...